Cases 31 - 40 of 147
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 2114
Dowe v. Prudential Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11633
Defendant:
Leeds Morelli & Brown LLP, Steven A. Morelli, Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, LLP and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Leeds Brown Law PC
Plaintiff:
Maureen Dowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Guzman Milton v. Valley Stream Central High School District et al
as 2:2018cv05849
Defendant:
Michael Mahler, Caroline Bormann, Valley Stream South High School and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Madigan, Zion Guzman-Milton and Zion Guzman Milton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Panchitkaew v. Nassau University Medical Center et al
as 2:2018cv04698
Defendant:
Maureen Moynihan, John Does, Eugene Yap and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Marut Panchitkaew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04460
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04460
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04460
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Dekom v. Goldman Sachs & Co. et al
as 2:2018cv04078
Defendant:
Maureen O'Connell, Goldman Sachs & Co., Bank of America N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Dekom
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
