Civil Rights Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 31 - 40 of 143
JONES-BEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv02785
Plaintiff: AMAALA JONES-BEY
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, TERRENCE SUTTON, CARLOS TEJERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUINN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2021cv02768
Plaintiff: ANDREW QUINN
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02668
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HELLER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv02376
Plaintiff: ANDREW HANSON, DICK ANTHONY HELLER and ELBY GODWIN
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and ROBERT CONTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREW v. MURRAY et al
as 1:2021cv01912
Plaintiff: BRETT ANDREW
Defendant: KENNETH MURRAY, KENNETH MURRAY PLOTZ, DAVID MARK WAITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01698
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CLYDE et al v. WALKER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01605
Defendant: WILLIAM J. WALKER and CATHERINE SZPINDOR
Plaintiff: ANDREW S. CLYDE, LOUIE GOHMERT and LLOYD SMUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JARVIS v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01523
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: DEREK N. JARVIS
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACK v. SPRING et al
as 1:2021cv01431
Defendant: NAI SPRING, DAN SPRING, MICHAEL GILL and others
Plaintiff: GUY ANDREW MACK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NELSON v. PLOTZ et al
as 1:2021cv01409
Defendant: STATE OF COLORADO, SETH RYAN, DAVID WAITE and others
Plaintiff: BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?