Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gadison et al v. McGuire et al
as 1:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Donald Gadison, Corey Bush, Brian Bush and others
Defendant:
McGuire, John Doe, John Poe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roy v. Bush et al
as 4:2008cv04005
Plaintiff:
Kamel K Roy
Defendant:
George W Bush, Dick Cheney and City of New York
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bush v. Lombard et al
as 1:2007cv05650
Plaintiff:
Bob Bush, Bob Bush and Bob Bush
Defendant:
D J Lombard, Sabella and T W Westbrooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Staten v. Bush
as 3:2007cv00665
Plaintiff:
James Staten
Defendant:
George Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Boyd et al v. Unknown Chicago Police Officers et al
as 1:2007cv05366
Plaintiff:
Aaron Boyd, Aaron Boyd, Aaron Boyd and others
Defendant:
Unknown Chicago Police Officers and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toodle v. Jean Albritton Center et al
as 1:2007cv04820
Plaintiff:
Sandra Toodle
Defendant:
Jean Albritton Center, Geraldine Turner, Matholomew Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Office of the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2007cv02502
Defendant:
Office of the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Illinois Cook County Department of Adult Probation, Phil Loizon and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coats v. Bush et al
as 3:2007cv50058
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Coats
Defendant:
George W Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
