Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Ali et al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv07970
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ali and Kevin Rivas
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Baneond O. Chinchilla, Brad A Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barrett v. Tamburrino et al.
as 1:2014cv04161
Plaintiff:
Brad Barrett
Defendant:
Officer Tamburrino, Officer Velez and City of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Illinois Transportation Trade Association et al
as 1:2014cv00827
Plaintiff:
Illinois Transportation Trade Association , Yellow Group LLC , Yellow Cab Affiliation Inc. and others
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Movant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grason v. State of Illinois Office of Inspector General et al
as 3:2014cv03021
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Grason
Defendant:
State of Illinois Office of Inspector General, Jule Hamos, Brad Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ross et al
as 1:2013cv01450
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Officer J. Ross , Sgt. Brad Abernathy and Knox County Sheriff David L. Clague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02758
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huon v. Mudge et al
as 3:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Meanith Huon
Defendant:
William Mudge , Chris Hoell , Amy Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc, Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
