Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Ovanesian v. Carpenter & Patterson, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00338
Defendant:
Carpenter & Patterson, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Iris B. Ovanesian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Alvarez v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv08063
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alvarez
Defendant:
City of New York, Christopher Heredia, Robert Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Peri v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03683
Plaintiff:
Loore Peri
Defendant:
City of New York, Richard Carpenter and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torcivia v. Suffolk et al
as 2:2015cv01791
Defendant:
Police Officer James Adler, Timothy J. Aiello, Investigator Thomas Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Torcivia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932
Graham v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv10092
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Graham
Defendant:
The City Of New York, John Doe, Keith Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creative Construction Services Corp. et al v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
as 1:2014cv07629
Plaintiff:
Creative Construction Services Corp. and Hanson James
Defendant:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
