Civil Rights Cases filed in Florida
Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Arden et al v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv23298
Plaintiff: Reidar Carroll Arden and The Arden Army
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Carroll
as 8:2016cv00998
Plaintiff: Shane Davis
Defendant: Mike Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. City of Delray Beach et al
as 9:2015cv81790
Plaintiff: Pauline Moody
Defendant: City of Delray Beach, State of Florida, Don Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01520
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Peterson et al v. Scott et al
as 6:2015cv02174
Plaintiff: Heidi Peterson and S. P.
Defendant: Rick Scott, Mike Carrol and Keith Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overcash v. Shelnutt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00555
Plaintiff: William Todd Overcash
Defendant: Mark D. Shelnutt , Mark D. Shelnutt, P.A. , Rebecca A. Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wymer v. Carroll
as 6:2015cv01786
Plaintiff: James Wymer
Defendant: Mike Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHALEY v. CARROLL, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00346
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SCOTT WHALEY
Defendant: SUSAN MARY CARROLL and STATE OF WISCONSIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHALEY v. CARROLL, ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00214
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SCOTT WHALEY
Defendant: SUSAN MARY CARROLL, ONEIDA COUNTY WISCONSIN COURT SYSTEM, STATE OF WISCONSIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karwel v. City of Palm Bay et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00597
Plaintiff: Sandra Kane Karwel
Defendant: City of Palm Bay, Joseph Poteat, Sherry Poteat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?