Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv61251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Morse v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv00569
Plaintiff:
Casey Morse
Defendant:
Mike Williams and Frank Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farquharson et al v. Hansell et al
as 6:2016cv00745
Plaintiff:
Beulah Farquharson and Earlton Farquharson
Defendant:
Robert (Bob) E. Hansell, Osceola County Sheriff's Office, Michael Furey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henning v. Walmart Stores Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01648
Plaintiff:
Bryan Henning
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Inc, D. Casey, County of Brevard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Reddish et al
as 3:2015cv00719
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Daniels
Defendant:
Barry Reddish, Mark Taylor, Herbert McCloud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLURE et al v. PANAMA CITY BAY COUNTY AIRPORT & INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
CASEY NEIL MCCLURE , MCCLURE MAINTENANCE LLC and JET SOUTH LLC
Defendant:
PANAMA CITY BAY COUNTY AIRPORT & INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, BARBARA MONTGOMERY, JAMES WHEALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Barfield v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2013cv00566
Plaintiff:
James Fred Barfield
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk , Michael C. Dipaolo , James D. Casey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riches v. Anthony
as 6:2012cv01524
Plaintiff:
Naomi Riches
Defendant:
Casey Anthony
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BLANKENSHIP v. TIMOTHY et al
as 3:2012cv00364
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE L BLANKENSHIP
Defendant:
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY and M CASEY RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
