Cases 31 - 40 of 41
City of Chicago v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2013cv06693
Plaintiff:
City of Chicago
Defendant:
Bryan Armstrong, Darice Armstrong, Aegis Funding Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Chicago v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2013cv05727
Plaintiff:
City of Chicago
Defendant:
Bryan Armstrong, Darice Armstrong, Aegis Funding Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Collins-Hardin v. Wm. Specialty Mortgage et al
as 3:2012cv50099
Plaintiff:
Willantha Collins-Hardin
Defendant:
Wm. Specialty Mortgage, American Home Mortgage Servicing, Chase Home Finance/Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv50386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Green et al v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv06345
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Green, Clanthia Green and Pamela M. Green
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A., Chase Home Finance LLC, Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv04480
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Police Dept. of Chicago, Life Storage Now and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
