Cases 31 - 40 of 2,287
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SHABAZZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
KWAM'E LAKIM SHABAZZ
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANNA GREY, DALLAS WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ADENARIWO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
ADE ADENARIWO, THERESA BROOKS, DENINE EDMONDS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5020
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Head of the United States Department of Justice. Named in his official capacity., Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Deon Colvin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, et al
as 24-7016
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Colvin
Defendant:
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Joshua Deahl, Assoc. Judge, Roy W. McLeese, III, Assoc. Judge and others
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
JAMIE DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
