Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Carden v. Boyd et al
as 3:2015cv00635
Plaintiff:
Yancy Carden
Defendant:
James Boyd , Village of Washington Park IL , John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. County of Cook, Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv03148
Plaintiff:
Dwayne L. Washington
Defendant:
County of Cook, Illinois , Thomas J. Dart , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chester v. Doe et al
as 1:2015cv01781
Plaintiff:
Preston Chester
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe #2 and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sherrod et al
as 3:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Jordan
Defendant:
C. Sherrod, John Doe, 1 and John Doe, 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark J. Neiweem v. Officer Carter et al
as 1:2014cv06116
Defendant:
Officer Carter, Officer Carol, Officer Hodgeman and others
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Neiweem
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Kern et al
as 1:2014cv01302
Plaintiff:
Ryan Newman
Defendant:
. Kern , John Doe, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alonzo Smith v. P.O. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2014cv05261
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Smith
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe #1 and P.O. John Doe #2
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dix v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2014cv03620
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dix
Defendant:
Mark J. Sullivan , Janet Napolitano , Julia Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schindler v. Advocate Healthcare et al
as 1:2014cv00880
Plaintiff:
Robert Schindler
Defendant:
Advocate Healthcare, Park Ridge Police Department, Municipality of Park Ridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 3:2013cv03218
Plaintiff:
Livell Figgs
Defendant:
Alex Dawson , Austin S Randolph, Jr , Lori Fishel and others
Respondent:
John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
