Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Emberton v. Gill
as 2:2011cv02126
Plaintiff:
Gregory C Emberton
Defendant:
Christopher J Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2011cv02113
Plaintiff:
Derek J Burton
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, Timothy F Bukowski, Michael Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Flint et al v. Harris County, Texas et al
as 1:2010cv03171
Plaintiff:
Alexander M. Flint and Ian B. Earley
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas, Gill, Revack, Samaan, and Muller, City of Pasadena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Flint et al v. Gill, Reavack, Saman et al
as 1:2009cv04307
Plaintiff:
Alexander M. Flint and Ian B. Earley
Defendant:
Gill, Reavack, Saman and 309th Judicial Court Harris County Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Carlos-El v. Devine et al
as 1:2007cv05914
Plaintiff:
Walter Steven Carlos-El
Defendant:
Richard A. Devine, Officer/Sgt. Gill, Officer/Sgt. Mersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Winfrey v. Walsh et al
as 2:2007cv02093
Plaintiff:
Georgia M Winfrey and Quentin Larry
Defendant:
Daniel Walsh, Heather Gill, Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
