Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Pidot et al v. New York State Board of Elections et al
as 2:2016cv03527
Defendant:
Robert A. Brehm, Douglas Kellner, Peter Kosinski and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Hawkins and Philip Pidot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sage-El v. Power et al
as 1:2015cv07417
Defendant:
C.O. Alvares, Judge M Armstrong, J Campanelli and others
Plaintiff:
Sage-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sage-El v. Power et al
as 1:2015cv09869
Plaintiff:
Sage-El
Defendant:
Power, Lam, McClean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Igartua v. Brooklyn Criminal Supreme Court et al
as 1:2015cv09156
Plaintiff:
Edna Igartua
Defendant:
Brooklyn Criminal Supreme Court, Brooklyn Legal Aide, Ronette C. Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawkins v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv00795
Plaintiff:
Lolita Hawkins
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Kimberly Hillery and Undercover Officer #137
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norea v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv06165
Defendant:
John Does, Jason Hawkins and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Kerron Norea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Igartua v. Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families et al
as 1:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
Edna Igartua
Defendant:
Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families, Rosa Cabrara, Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nunez v. Esposito et al
as 1:2014cv00413
Defendant:
Det. Robert Anderson, P.O. Vincent Esposito, Det. Edwin Estrada and others
Plaintiff:
Claudio Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
