Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Chavez-Hankins et al v. Duran et al
as 1:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Claudette Chavez-Hankins , Paul Pacheco and Miguel Vega
Defendant:
Dianna J. Duran , Susana Martinez , Alvin Warren and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Brian Egolf , Maurilio Castro , Hakim Bellamy and others
Intervenor:
Ben Lujan, Sr. , Timothy Z. Jennings , Antonio Maestas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eden v. Lama et al
as 1:2011cv00465
Plaintiff:
James Wallace Eden
Defendant:
Albert Lama, Alex Romero, Alice Gandaradiaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stonecipher et al v. Valles et al
as 1:2011cv00417
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stonecipher and Melissa Stonecipher
Defendant:
Carlos Valles , John Estrada , Matt Crecilius and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. Carlson et al
as 1:2010cv00960
Plaintiff:
Jasper Z King
Defendant:
Tim Carlson and Robert Salas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Benford et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jennifer M King
Defendant:
Mark Benford , John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woodruff et al v. Herrera et al
as 1:2010cv00686
Plaintiff:
Alan P. Woodruff, Terry Mulcahy, Craig Harris and others
Defendant:
Mary Herrera , Don Francisco Trujillo and Gary K. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lewis v. Burger King
as 6:2009cv00962
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lewis
Defendant:
Burger King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
