Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Duckett v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04091
Plaintiff:
Richard Duckett
Defendant:
The City of New York , Neil Lawson and John Doe # 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03707
Plaintiff:
Donald Ellis , Robin Sampson and Arlander Wilson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Ray Henry, Lonnie Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wigfall v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03248
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wigfall
Defendant:
The City of New York , Lonnie Brown, Neil Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilliard v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00961
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hilliard
Defendant:
The City of New York , Neil Lawson and John Doe # 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dennis v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv08289
Plaintiff:
Lamar Dennis
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department, Neil Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv06293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawson v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2010cv01683
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, John Doe Officers #1-5 and Officer Arturo Salazar
Plaintiff:
James Donnell Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mullins v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mullins
Defendant:
The City of New York, Neil Lawson, John Does 1 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
