Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Walker et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv01756
Plaintiff:
Dion Walker and Hanna Walker
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Tamara Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Clemmons et al
as 2:2013cv02027
Plaintiff:
Michael Gardner
Defendant:
Holly F Clemmons, Gail Rogers and Tamara Biggers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCullough v. Akiba Schechter Jewish Day School et al
as 1:2012cv07776
Defendant:
Akiba Schechter Jewish Day School and Miriam Schiller
Plaintiff:
Tamara McCullough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Skube v. Williamson et al
as 3:2012cv03185
Plaintiff:
Tamara Skube
Defendant:
Neil M Williamson, Joseph Roesch, Travis Dalby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Matthews
as 1:2010cv08173
Plaintiff:
Heasley G. Matthews, Jr.
Defendant:
Tamara Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pennington et al v. Arce et al
as 1:2010cv05949
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pennington, Sr and Maurice Pennington, Jr.
Defendant:
Edward A. Arce, Joan B Gottschall , Rosie Lewis and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trombetta v. McEwen et al
as 1:2010cv05193
Plaintiff:
Tamara L. Trombetta
Defendant:
Erwin McEwen and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. White Lodging Services Marriott
as 1:2010cv01688
Plaintiff:
Tamara A. Clark
Defendant:
White Lodging Services Marriott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
