Cases 421 - 430 of 35,359
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Davis v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03373
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Davis
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Corona et al v. North Central Narcotics Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Leticia Corona, Angel Rivera, J. H. and others
Defendant:
North Central Narcotics Task Force, Brendan F. Kelly, John Doe North Central Narcotics Task Force Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Melcher et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coleman
Defendant:
Melcher and Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson, as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Richardson v. King et al
as 2:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Amy Richardson, as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Richardson
Defendant:
Jerry King and Village of Rantoul, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Su v. Holsten Management Corp
as 1:2024cv04037
Plaintiff:
Chong Ho Su
Defendant:
Holsten Management Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
