Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Koch et al v. Juber et al
as 5:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
Felicia Koch , Amber Blevins , Ashley Bolding and others
Defendant:
David Juber, Jamie Baker, Gilbert Dildine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Blueberry et al v. Comanche County Facilities Authority et al
as 5:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
Natasha Blueberry , Frances Burrell , Kathern Easter and others
Defendant:
Comanche County Facilities Authority , Lamont Rainwater, Dale Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Collins v. Scott Lowery Law Office P.C. et al
as 4:2012cv00533
Plaintiff:
Karl Collins
Defendant:
Scott Lowery Law Office P.C. , Nicholas M Tait , Jessica L Tait and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rollins v. Atwood et al
as 5:2010cv01010
Plaintiff:
Tony James Rollins
Defendant:
Jessica Atwood, Marcus Williams, Daniel Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
