Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williamson v. Day et al
as 3:2018cv00776
Plaintiff:
Arther L. Williamson
Defendant:
Lance M. Day, Natalie A. Tuttle and Kevin A. Hemphill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell et al v. Modern Day Property Management, Inc.
as 8:2018cv01189
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Powell and Tiffany Powell
Defendant:
Modern Day Property Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv62318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 1:2017cv22618
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Day et al v. Citrus County, Florida et al
as 8:2016cv03192
Plaintiff:
Shirley J. Day , Kaitlynn R. Morris , Estate of Dawn Renee Cameron and others
Defendant:
Citrus County, Florida, Ron Kitchen, Jeffrey J. Dawsy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barberi v. Fast Pay Day Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv22014
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Fast Pay Day Loans, Inc. and Hecos Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Rice v. City of North Port et al
as 8:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rice
Defendant:
City of North Port, Rhonda Y. DiFranco, Kevin Vespia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Henning v. Day et al
as 6:2015cv00927
Plaintiff:
Bryan Henning
Defendant:
Raymond Day, Alex Martus, Jeremy Felty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
