Cases 41 - 50 of 205
Thomas v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01275
Plaintiff:
Margaret Thomas
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wilson v. City of Danville et al
as 2:2021cv02194
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wilson
Defendant:
City of Danville, Clifford Hegg, T.J. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. George et al
as 3:2021cv00299
Defendant:
City of DuQuoin, Raymond George, Perry County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luce et al v. Kelly et al
as 1:2021cv01250
Plaintiff:
Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Nicholas A. Luce, David M. Rice and others
Defendant:
Jarod Ingebrigtsen and Brendan F. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Protesters in Support of Black Lives et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv06851
Defendant:
#18659 Levon London, #19896 R. A. Ayala, #351 Patricia Zuber and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Vail, Protesters in Support of Black Lives, Jeannine Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe I et al v. The Board of Education of the City of Chicago
as 1:2020cv06486
Defendant:
The Board of Education of the City of Chicago, John Thuet, District 14 of CPS Schools and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, II and John Doe I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
