Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Brooks v. Wisz et al
as 1:2017cv02851
Plaintiff:
Jawone Brooks
Defendant:
Donald E. Wisz, Matthew J. Pasko, Joseph B. Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. City of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
Bobby Sanford
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Department, Lee #1638, Johnson #8265 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanking v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv00210
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lanking
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , City Of Chicago Police Department, E. Amparan Star# 4614 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv11716
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jones
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Wherfel and Unknown City of Chicago Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fergusen v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv11174
Plaintiff:
Bernard Fergusen
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Chicago Police Officer Carreno and Unnamed and Unknown City of Chicago Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. City of Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2016cv09824
Plaintiff:
Jason Noel Johnson
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Dept., Peter Theodore and Rocco Pruger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gebremariam v. City Of Chicago Police Department
as 1:2016cv06655
Plaintiff:
Girma Gebremariam
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawks v. City of Chicago Police et al
as 1:2016cv04944
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hawks
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police, Larry Gade and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. The County of Cook et al
as 1:2015cv06935
Plaintiff:
Steven Edwards
Defendant:
The County of Cook, Thomas Dart, Cook County Department Of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
