Cases 41 - 50 of 90
CLARK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2015cv00152
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CURTIS CLARK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SNELLGROVE v. DAVIS, ET AL
as 1:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
CURTIS RAY SNELLGROVE
Defendant:
HARRY DAVIS , ANTHONY NORTHROP , BENJAMIN CRISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Curtis v. Bollinger et al
as 6:2014cv01345
Plaintiff:
Tim Curtis
Defendant:
Anthony Bollinger, City of Titusville, Florida, William A. Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorenc v. Hennessee
as 6:2014cv01065
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lorenc
Defendant:
Stephen Hennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYNTON v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2014cv00292
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, LINDSEY CAMERON, CURTIS NORTON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOYNTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. Curtis et al
as 8:2014cv00727
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
US Marshal Curtis, U.S. Marshal Livingston and Unknown Latin Man Intake Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castro v. City of Miami et al
as 1:2014cv20504
Plaintiff:
Jorge Castro , Nestor Garcia , Francisco Casanovas and others
Defendant:
City of Miami , City of Miami Firefighters and Police Officers Retirement Trust & Plan , Board of Trustees of the City of Miami Firefighters and Police Officers Retirement Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curtis v. Beseler et al
as 3:2013cv01352
Plaintiff:
C. William Curtis
Defendant:
Rick Beseler , Angel Acosta , Jared Bludsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
