Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lane v. Salgado et al
as 1:2013cv03764
Plaintiff:
Travles Lane
Defendant:
Danny Salgado and City of Chicago, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Alton v. Lane et al
as 3:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
Randall R. Alton
Defendant:
Mike Lane and City of Carlyle, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc, Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane et al v. Kozenczak et al
as 1:2011cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lane , Stephanie Lane , T. L. and others
Defendant:
Kozenczak, Hamala, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chicago Housing Authority et al v. Board of Directors of the Enclave at Galewood Crossings Master Association et al
as 1:2010cv07681
Plaintiff:
Chicago Housing Authority and RSD Galewood, LLC
Defendant:
Board of Directors of the Enclave at Galewood Crossings Master Association, Charles Catchings, Marie Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lane v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv07178
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Lane and Evelyn Lane
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, K. D. Ebersole and S. P. Flynn
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hethcoat et al v. McCormack et al
as 1:2007cv05389
Plaintiff:
Robert Hethcoat and Lisa Dolan
Defendant:
Kathleen McCormack, Kathleen McCormack, Enrique Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
