Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Austin et al v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv05411
Plaintiff:
Jason Austin, Antwan Belcher, Jeffrey Finley and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, Patrick Deenihan, Gregory Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Osborn v. Crawford et al
as 3:2008cv50152
Plaintiff:
Penny Osborn
Defendant:
Scott Crawford, Larry Mason, Kelly Given and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kelley v. Crawford et al
as 3:2008cv50150
Plaintiff:
Melissa Kelley
Defendant:
Scott Crawford, Larry Mason, Kelly Given and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McMackin v. Crawford et al
as 3:2008cv50153
Plaintiff:
Tamara McMackin
Defendant:
Scott Crawford, Larry Mason, Kelly Given and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beisner v. Crawford et al
as 3:2008cv50151
Plaintiff:
Paul Beisner
Defendant:
Scott Crawford, Larry Mason, Kelly Given and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riley v. Righter et al
as 1:2008cv01719
Plaintiff:
Shirley Riley
Defendant:
Gina Righter, Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 510, County of Cook, State of Illinois, Community College District No. 510, County of Cook, State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
