Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Thompson v. County of Kendall, Illinois et al
as 1:2010cv03139
Plaintiff:
David E. Thompson
Defendant:
County of Kendall, Illinois , Anne Vickery , John Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hurbert v. City of Galesburg et al
as 1:2010cv01121
Plaintiff:
Damon L Hurbert
Defendant:
City of Galesburg, Phillip Pieper, Timothy Losey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Leezer et al v. Shaw et al
as 1:2010cv01219
Plaintiff:
Claudia Leezer, Claudia Leezer, Claudia Leezer and others
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Terry McCann, Anthony Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kozel et al v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2009cv01145
Plaintiff:
Elliot R. Kozel, Jerimie Sanders and Matthew Kiely
Defendant:
Village of Dolton, Robert Shaw and Robert Fox
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pittman v. Village of Dolton, The et al
as 1:2009cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Pittman, Jr.
Defendant:
Village of Dolton, The, William Shaw, Evangeline Levison and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv02187
Plaintiff:
Benny R Shaw
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Champaign County States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw v. Village of Riverdale et al
as 1:2008cv03529
Plaintiff:
Michael A Shaw
Defendant:
Village of Riverdale, Unknown Riverdale Police Officers, Village of Dolton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
