Cases 41 - 50 of 371
Ortega v. Foothills Regional Housing
as 1:2023cv01106
Plaintiff:
Rachel Ortega and Rachel D. Ortega
Defendant:
Foothills Regional Housing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Muthle v. Hostel Fish, LLC
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Champion D. Muthle
Defendant:
Hostel Fish, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 - IDEA: Challenge Decision re: Education for Handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 American With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Manning v. Boyle et al
as 1:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Sitges Manning
Defendant:
Donald B. Boyle, Susan K. Muthart, Governor's Place Condominium Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. Adams County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 1:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Nick Bowman, Jr
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriffs Dept., Adam K. Shadi-Kingsley, Daniel E. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MRG v. Toussaint et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Meleaha Glapion-Pressley and MRG
Defendant:
Don Toussaint, Echo Ryan, Charles Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
