Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Betancourt v. Ada County et al
as 1:2010cv00430
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt, IV
Defendant:
Ada County, Ada County Clerks, Ada County Court Assistance Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Betancourt v. Riley et al
as 1:2010cv00383
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt, IV
Defendant:
Darlene Riley, Brad Knell, Idaho State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendall et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Gary Kendall, Raymond Corbus and Wendi Michalk
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Idaho, C. L. Otter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wicklund v. Ada County et al
as 1:2009cv00673
Plaintiff:
Mark Stephen Wicklund
Defendant:
Ada County and John/Jane Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Michalk v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2009cv00600
Plaintiff:
Wendi Lee Michalk
Defendant:
State of Idaho, C.L. Butch Otter, Ada County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Betancourt v. Ada County et al
as 1:2009cv00549
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt
Defendant:
Ada County, Owyhee County, Canyon County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Betancourt v. Ada County et al
as 1:2009cv00461
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt
Defendant:
Ada County, Canyon County, Idaho State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
