Cases 51 - 60 of 655
Gayles v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05762
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gayles
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Reed et al
as 3:2022cv50359
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony M Brown
Defendant:
Mr. Paul Reed, Officer Hruska, Waylon Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Fairfield v. Clinton et al
as 3:2022cv02016
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fairfield
Defendant:
J. Harrell Clinton, Ryan White, Massac County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nave v. Pugh et al
as 1:2022cv03991
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sesley Nave
Defendant:
Lamont Pugh, Christy Wells, Peter Theiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green et al v. Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv02918
Plaintiff:
Julissa Green, Danasha Mccory and Baylie Bell
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Anthony Ceja, Joseph Deferville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City of Rockford, Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv50145
Plaintiff:
Denise Davis
Defendant:
City of Rockford, Illinois and Anthony Curran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ochoa v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv02283
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY OCHOA
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer Demetrio Muro, Star No. 9180, Officer Jonathan Martinez, Star No. 17514 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
