Cases 51 - 60 of 106
Baker v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv08940
Plaintiff:
Ben Baker and Clarissa Glenn
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taybron v. Shaw et al
as 1:2016cv04564
Plaintiff:
David Taybron
Defendant:
Shaw, Baker, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn Baker v. Sergeant Guy Papa et al
as 1:2016cv04426
Plaintiff:
Lynn Baker
Defendant:
Sergeant Guy Papa, Detective Green and City of Berwyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Fedorova et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 1:2016cv01810
Plaintiff:
Elena Fedorova, America's Servicing Company and James M. Strother
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company , WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. , Wells Fargo Financial, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frederick Bell v. P.O. Jim Paoletti #5451 et al
as 1:2016cv01034
Plaintiff:
Frederick Bell
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
P.O. Jim Paoletti #5451, P.O. Nicole Marano #19475, P.O. M. Baker #19740 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. Wiberg et al
as 1:2016cv00679
Plaintiff:
George Charles
Defendant:
Lieutenant Wiberg, W. Ortiz, C. Skrapunski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Baker v. P.O. Robert A. Vahl et al
as 1:2016cv00483
Plaintiff:
Antonio Baker
Defendant:
P.O. Robert A. Vahl, P.O. Augle, P.O. Russell and others
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
