Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Carter v. O' Carrol et al
as 3:2012cv00740
Plaintiff:
Ronald Carter
Defendant:
Patrick P. O' Carrol, Jr., The Social Security Administration (SSA), Twelve unknown Social Security dministration Cooperative Disability Investigator (CDI) Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simpson v. City of Lauderhill, Florida et al
as 0:2012cv60732
Plaintiff:
Rupert Simpson
Defendant:
City of Lauderhill, Florida and Christopher Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES et al
as 9:2012cv80416
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN J SPENCER
Defendant:
CHILD AND FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC , KATHY CRIST , NICHOLE SLADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv21135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv61810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES et al
as 4:2011cv00358
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN J SPENCER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, CHILD AND FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC, KATHY CRIST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schonwalder et al v. Burk et al
as 6:2011cv01192
Plaintiff:
Karl Alan Schonwalder and Karl Alan Schoenwalder
Defendant:
Frank Bonetti, Kimberly L. Burk, Michael Nikitenko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
