Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Ratner v. Robinson et al
as 2:2014cv07337
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Detectives John Doe, Nassau County Office of the District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Seth Ratner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nuraina v. Diamond
as 1:2012cv04304
Plaintiff:
Hamed Nuraina
Defendant:
Seth Diamond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Richardson v. New York City et al
as 1:2012cv02545
Plaintiff:
Raymond Richardson
Defendant:
New York City and Seth Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv09652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ritchie v. Bubb et al
as 1:2011cv01185
Defendant:
Victor Peshkin, P.O. Gerard Capers, Milton Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Seth Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mumford v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2011cv07839
Plaintiff:
Hollis Mumford
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg, Seth Diamond, Arlene Bogado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brodeur v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2011cv04650
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brodeur
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg, Ray Kelly, Paul Browne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caractor v. City of New York Department of Homeless Services et al
as 1:2011cv02990
Plaintiff:
William B. Caractor
Defendant:
City of New York Department of Homeless Services, Seth Diamond, HELP1 USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caractor v. City of New York Department of Homeless Services et al
as 1:2011cv02988
Plaintiff:
William B. Caractor
Defendant:
City of New York Department of Homeless Services, Seth Diamond, Xenia Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
