Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Parks v. Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv00090
Defendant:
Bull Head Police Dept., Edge Water Casino, Christy D Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Edward F Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. NAMMS Mental Health et al
as 3:2015cv00594
Defendant:
Dr. Diss, Barbra Ann Keller, Dr. Linch and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Elizabeth Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hirata et al v. Southern Nevada Health District et al
as 2:2013cv02302
Defendant:
Kim Dipasquale, Cara Evangelista, Lorraine Forston and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Hirata, Angela Jones and Whitnie Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Beckett et al
as 2:2013cv02199
Defendant:
Robert Beckett, David Boruchowitz, Anthony Demeo and others
Plaintiff:
Daryal Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01944
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Barajas-Miramonte v. Ross et al
as 3:2012cv00559
Defendant:
Stuart Balch, John Breternitz, Mike Haley and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Barajas-Miramonte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Cruise et al
as 2:2011cv01289
Defendant:
Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes, Metro/CPS and others
Plaintiff:
Karen M. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
