Cases 51 - 60 of 1,354
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Northeastern Illinois University et al
as 1:2023cv03961
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
Northeastern Illinois University, Thomas Philon, Alberto Lopez-Carrasquillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Anderson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03349
Plaintiff:
Robert O Anderson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cook County Jail, Cook County IL. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MACIAS v. VERTA et al
as 1:2023cv03335
Plaintiff:
JOSE R MACIAS
Defendant:
RAYMOND VERTA, THOMAS PURTELL JR. and THE CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nanez v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03162
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nanez
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
