Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Miles vs. Jones, et al
as 5:2010cv04104
Plaintiff:
Ray Anthony Miles
Defendant:
Herman T. Jones and Steven A. Zeller
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Reedy et al v. McDaniel et al
as 5:2010cv03155
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Reedy , Todd Deal , Grant Nixon and others
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Salvation Army
as 2:2009cv02061
Plaintiff:
Ruby L. Jones
Defendant:
Salvation Army
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Wright Business School
as 2:2008cv02361
Plaintiff:
Chaya Jones
Defendant:
Wright Business School
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Wyandotte County Police Department et al
as 2:2008cv02358
Plaintiff:
Chaya Jones
Defendant:
State Judge and State Police Officers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Housing Authority of Kansas City, Kansas, The et al
as 2:2008cv02359
Plaintiff:
Chaya Jones
Defendant:
Housing Authority of Kansas City, Kansas, State Police Officers and Housing Urban Development
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Providence Medical Center et al
as 2:2008cv02360
Plaintiff:
Chaya Jones
Defendant:
Providence Medical Center, State Police Officers and Emergency Department Employees
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
