Cases 61 - 70 of 134
Sevor vs. Simon et al
as 1:2016cv01260
Plaintiff:
Richard Erin Gray Sevor
Defendant:
Deborah Simon, Proctor Hospital, Methodist Medical Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitford et al v. Davis et al
as 3:2016cv00596
Plaintiff:
Kayla Whitford and Mark Carter
Defendant:
David Davis and Village of South Roxana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
El Ghouleh v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv05825
Plaintiff:
Kahreem El Ghouleh
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Israel Gamez, Louis Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair et al v. Carter et al
as 1:2016cv04416
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Sinclair , Jonathan Sinclair and Eric Lundy
Defendant:
Scott Carter, Bryan Harris and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Segovia et al v. Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv10196
Plaintiff:
Luis Segovia , Jose Antonio Torres , Pamela Lynn Colon and others
Defendant:
Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago , Langdon D. Neal , Karen Kinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04717
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marcus Williams v. P.O. Carter, #16352 et al
as 1:2015cv03511
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
P.O. Bishop, P.O. Carter, Officers John Doe and others
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
