Cases 61 - 70 of 344
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Allen Properties-Group 36, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv10042
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
ALLEN PROPERTIES - GROUP 36, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Allen Properties-Group 36, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Huntington Partnership et al
as 8:2021cv02136
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
HUNTINGTON PARTNERSHIP, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. PM Partners, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv02137
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
PM PARTNERS, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Duke CA Investment LLC et al
as 8:2021cv02135
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
DUKE CA INVESTMENT LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Miramar-Park Towers 1, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv10031
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
MIRAMAR - PARK TOWERS 1, LLC, MIRAMAR- PARK TOWERS 2, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. The 1994 11th Street Partners, LP et al
as 2:2021cv10027
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
THE 1994 11TH STREET PARTNERS, L.P., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, The 1994 11th Street Partners, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Landing Property Investments LLC et al
as 2:2021cv10028
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
LANDING PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v.Pacific View et al
as 2:2021cv10030
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
PACIFIC VIEW, DAVID CLEMENTS, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Tuscany Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv09236
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
TUSCANY INVESTMENTS, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. SCCO College Properties, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01935
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
SCCO COLLEGE PROPERTIES, INC., LAS PALMAS - FULLERTON II, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
