Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Bame et al v. Iron County et al
as 2:2010cv00890
Plaintiff:
Mildred Bame , Desma R. Auclair , Ronda L. McKinnis and others
Defendant:
Iron County, Iron County Sheriff's Office, Mark O. Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chrisman v. Hatch et al.
as 2:2010cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kristine Chrisman
Defendant:
Cleve Hatch, Alisha Gowan, Ryan Evershed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Washington County et al
as 2:2009cv01112
Plaintiff:
Joan Jones
Defendant:
Washington County, Washington County Purgatory Correctional Facility and Washington County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasquez-Marquez v. Troxel et al
as 2:2009cv00955
Plaintiff:
David Vasquez-Marquez
Defendant:
Mark Troxel and Utah County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Thompson v. Box Elder County et al
as 1:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
Robert N. Thompson
Defendant:
Box Elder County, Box Elder County Sheriff's Department and Scott Lewis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stephenson v. Utah County et al
as 2:2008cv00433
Plaintiff:
Terry J. Stephenson and Terry J. Stephenson
Defendant:
Utah County, James O. Tracy, Jr., Utah County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
