Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Minott v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01217
Plaintiff:
Hopeton Minott
Defendant:
The City of New York , James Duffy, Arlene Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overstreet v. The City of New York et al
as 7:2011cv00944
Plaintiff:
Arlene Overstreet
Defendant:
The City of New York, John Doe 1-2 and Robert Titza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overstreet v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00944
Plaintiff:
Arlene Overstreet
Defendant:
The City of New York , John Doe 1-2 and Robert Titza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05318
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Burton v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2010cv09550
Plaintiff:
Ann Burton
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki, Ginette Joubert, Francisca Go and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marte et al v. New York City Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv03706
Plaintiff:
Ramon Marte, Arlene Martinez and Luis Benitez
Defendant:
New York City Police Department, New York Drug Enforcement Task Force, Victor Lebron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt-Bey v. Bush et al
as 1:2010cv03258
Plaintiff:
Ronald B. Britt-Bey
Defendant:
George Herbert Walker Bush, George Walker Bush, Arlen Spector and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Winningham v. Wake et al
as 7:2009cv02271
Defendant:
Neil V. Wake, John M. Roll, Randy Ely and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Johnson et al v. The City of New York (N.Y.P.D.)
as 1:2008cv03673
Plaintiff:
David R. Johnson, Arlene A. Quick, Infinite Barnett and others
Defendant:
The City of New York (N.Y.P.D.)
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
