Cases 71 - 80 of 103
WILLIAMS-STRIPLIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS-STRIPLIN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DIRECTOR OF FBI WASHINGTON DC FIELD OFFICE, FBI POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HUTCHINS v. SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS et al
as 1:2016cv01565
Plaintiff:
BARRY HUTCHINS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS, ROBERT SHERMAN, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DANTZLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv02142
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. MABUS et al
as 1:2015cv01669
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR., SAM ERHART, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DRAKE et al v. ALEXANDER et al
as 1:2015cv01353
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DRAKE , DIANE ROARK , ED LOOMIS and others
Defendant:
KEITH ALEXANDER, MICHAEL HAYDEN, LANNY BREUER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. FISHBACK et al
as 1:2015cv01202
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, SEAN LANGFORD, JAMES COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv00959
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
DRIESSEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2015cv00693
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE DRIESSEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UK MEGA MILLIONS LOTTERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
