Cases 71 - 80 of 85
LEWIS, et al v. FENTY et al
as 1:2008cv00120
Defendant:
ADRIAN FENTY, NATWAR M. GANDHI, H. DEAN BOULAND and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA J. LEWIS and RADCLIFFE B. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MEIER v. DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv01940
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. MEIER
Defendant:
DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv01663
Plaintiff:
GLENNA LEWIS and GLENNA LEWIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and CALVIN GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MATHIS et al v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01155
Plaintiff:
KEITH MATHIS, REON HOLLOWAY, DAVID ROGERS and others
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LEWIS v. BAYH
as 1:2007cv00939
Plaintiff:
GEORGE M. LEWIS
Defendant:
EVAN BAYH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LEWIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIARY et al
as 1:2007cv00697
Plaintiff:
RADCLIFFE BANCROFT LEWIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
