Cases 71 - 80 of 141
PORTER v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2015cv00485
Plaintiff:
FONTAINE LEROY PORTER
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, DONIE LEE and RICK RAMSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macleod v. Governor Rick Scott et al
as 3:2015cv00932
Plaintiff:
Robert Craig Macleod
Defendant:
Governor Rick Scott and Attorney General Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings et al v. Obama et al
as 1:2015cv22794
Plaintiff:
Paul Cummings and Theresa Cummings
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Loretta E. Lynch, Office of Governor Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bitton v. Burger King et al
as 9:2015cv80861
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bitton
Defendant:
Burger King, Starbucks, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN JERMAINE JACKSON
Defendant:
PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICK SCOTT and RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piero Bugoni v. Rick Scott
as 15-11815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIERO A. BUGONI
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK SCOTT, Governor, in his official and individual capacities
Davies v. Scott et al
as 6:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jeff Davies
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Pam Bondi, Rick Swearingen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall-Desousa et al v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles et al
as 6:2014cv01959
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wall-Desousa and Scott Wall-Desousa
Defendant:
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Terry L. Rhodes, Dianne Dowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Piero Bugoni v. Governor of Florida
as 14-15195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIERO A. BUGONI
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, Rick Scott, In His Official Capacity
BANKS v CREWS, et al
as 4:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
CHADWICK DEWELLYN BANKS
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , PAM BONDI , RICK SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
