Cases 81 - 90 of 210
Morris v. Gordon et al
as 1:2015cv05872
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1- 10, P.O. Patrick Gordon and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crew v. City of New York, et al
as 1:2015cv07196
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Crew
Defendant:
City of New York , William Morris and Daniel Omahoney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burrowes v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05097
Plaintiff:
Stephen Burrowes
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Andre Morris and Police Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chmura v. Galen et al
as 1:2015cv06151
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
Phyllis Galen, Kimberly Bonner, Rick DeFuria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03799
Defendant:
Police Officer Francis Aindo, #15407, City of New York, John Doe Police Officers #1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv04143
Plaintiff:
Andre Perry
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Correa and Angela Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zadok v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03674
Plaintiff:
David Zadok
Defendant:
The City of New York, Garfield Mead, John/Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03121
Plaintiff:
Romeo Morris
Defendant:
The City of New York , Jonathan Perez and John Does # 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02164
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
