Civil Rights Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 81 - 90 of 96
BELL v. THE MEN'S STORE AT SAKS FIFTH AVENUE
as 1:2008cv00556
Plaintiff: KAREEMAH BELL
Defendant: THE MEN'S STORE AT SAKS FIFTH AVENUE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BELL v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
as 1:2008cv00370
Plaintiff: KAREEMAH BELL
Defendant: GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2007cv01971
Plaintiff: KAREEMAH YASMINA BELL
Defendant: PAMELA SCOTT, SECURITY PROTESTIVE SERVICES, INC and SAFEWAY GROCERY STORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL v. GARDNER
as 1:2007cv01980
Plaintiff: KAREEMAH BELL
Defendant: KEITH GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL-BOSTON v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CLERKS'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2007cv01769
Plaintiff: KAREEMAH BELL-BOSTON
Defendant: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CLERKS'S OFFICE and US MARSHALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL v. ERWIN
as 1:2007cv01190
Plaintiff: KAREEMAH BELL
Defendant: MICHAEL ERWIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS et al
as 1:2007cv01083
Plaintiff: KAREEMAH BELL
Defendant: LIBRARY OF CONGRESS and KENNETH E. LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00894
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00539
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BELL v. ARDELLE ASSOCIATES
as 1:2007cv00312
Plaintiff: KAREEMAH YASMINA BELL
Defendant: ARDELLE ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?