Cases 81 - 90 of 221
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Ryder v. Booth; et al.
as 1:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Ryder , Buddy K. Ryder and Wailau Ryder
Defendant:
Martin Frank Booth, County of Hawaii , Doe Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Char et al v. City and County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2016cv00058
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu , Honolulu Police Department , Louis M. Kealoha and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann K. Char and Mark A. Char
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hatori-Neuchterlein v. County of Hawaii
as 1:2016cv00021
Defendant:
County of Hawaii and Doe Defendants 1-100
Plaintiff:
Kanoelani K Hatori-Neuchterlein and Shauna Fergerstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kealoha, Jr. v. Ige
as 1:2015cv00478
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Kealoha, Jr. , Virgil E. Day , Josiah L. Hoohuli and others
Defendant:
David Y. Ige , Robert K. Lindsey, Jr., Colette Y. Machado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Nai Aupuni Directors et al
as 1:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Harris M. Fuller, Jr.
Defendant:
Nai Aupuni Directors, James K. Asam, Pauline N. Namu'o and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2015cv00363
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Martin , Tracy Martin , T. M. and others
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu and DOE Employees of City and County of Honolulu 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00358
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
