Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Robinson v. Oberes et al
as 2:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Ashley Robinson
Defendant:
Lorna Caba-At Oberes, Audrey Arnold, Barbara Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith et al v. Clark County, Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv01881
Plaintiff:
Smith Jessica, Michael Blake and Jessica Smith
Defendant:
Clark County, Nevada, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Kevin Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Campbell v. Bluth et al
as 2:2021cv01499
Plaintiff:
Chanse Campbell
Defendant:
Jacqueline M. Bluth, Michelle Jobe, Carl Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Curtis v. State of Washington Inc et al
as 2:2020cv02252
Defendant:
Tessie Rabchenko, State of Washington Inc and Arnold and Smith Insurance Agency
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gober v. Arnold
as 3:2020cv00484
Defendant:
Carl E Arnold
Plaintiff:
Adam Gober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Pastuna et al
as 2:2019cv02098
Defendant:
Keith Bryant, Jennifer Kennedy, Gilberto Valenzuela and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Magee v. Shoshone Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation et al
as 3:2019cv00697
Defendant:
Yvonne Howard, William Reynolds, Theodore Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Magee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Patsuna et al
as 2:2018cv01276
Defendant:
K Bryant, J Auschwitz, C Patsuna and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vidal v. Arnold et al
as 2:2017cv02885
Defendant:
Carol Arnold, Clark County District Attorney Office, Mary Kay Holthus and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Vidal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
