Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Goodwin v. Decatur Earthmover Credit Union et al
as 3:2024cv03081
Plaintiff:
Tasheka D Goodwin
Defendant:
Decatur Earthmover Credit Union, Christine Wilbur, Tiffani Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Golbert et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Charles Golbert, J. B., K. J. and others
Defendant:
Marc D. Smith, Debra Dyer-Webster, Beverly J. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Goodwin et al
as 2:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Clarence Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Goodwin, First Financial Bank and Davis and Delanois Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodwin v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07043
Plaintiff:
Darnell Goodwin
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schmidt v. Lakin et al
as 3:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Rana Schmidt
Defendant:
John D. Lakin, Madison County, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2020cv02157
Defendant:
Vermilion County Illinois, Brett Stine, Danville Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Goodwin & Associates Hospitality Services, LLC
as 1:2019cv05175
Plaintiff:
Carissa Morales
Defendant:
Goodwin & Associates Hospitality Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coker et al v. Witvoet et al
as 2:2018cv02055
Plaintiff:
Daniel C Coker and Anita Coker
Defendant:
Jon Witvoet, Bethany Hager and Mark Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
