Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Starks v. City of Miami Gardens et al
as 1:2023cv23851
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robin Starks
Defendant:
City of Miami Gardens and Police Chief Delma Noel-Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Delman et al
as 1:2023cv21650
Plaintiff:
Salinas Falun Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Keith Delman and William Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
EMRIT v. PRATT et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Defendant:
CHIEF DISIPLINARY COUNSEL, ATTORNEY KARA PRATT, TEXAS SUPREME COURT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simon v. DeSantis et al
as 1:2023cv20566
Plaintiff:
Chrisnel Simon
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Casey DeSantis, State Attorney Katherine F. Rundle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Rushing et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Medgine Sarah Jean
Defendant:
Karen E. Rushing, Todd Newton, Jeffrey R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JONES v. SWEARINGEN et al
as 4:2021cv00054
Defendant:
FDLE AGENT JOHN DOE, RICK SWEARINGEN and NOEL PRATTS
Plaintiff:
REBEKAH JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Bandin et al
as 1:2020cv22805
Defendant:
Laura Shearon Cruz, Roy Tillman, Xavier Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Muhammad Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv62569
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
