Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Flowers v. The State of Delaware et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
King James Albert Flowers and King - Joshua
Defendant:
The State of Delaware, The Soverreign Jurisdiction of The Federal Court of Delaware State, The Governors Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Howard v. Denn et al
as 1:2018cv00389
Plaintiff:
Stanley-Bernard Howard
Defendant:
Matthew P. Denn and State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd et al v. Markell et al
as 1:2017cv00431
Plaintiff:
Saundra M. Floyd , Candyss C. White , Steven R. Floyd, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Jack Markell , Ruth Ann Minner , Stanley W. Taylor, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baylis v. Harmon, et al
as 1:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Jill Baylis
Defendant:
Sherrie Harmon , Michelle Berezansky and Stanley Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Moore et al v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Moore and Eugene Hendricks
Defendant:
State of Delaware, Dept. of Corrections, Stanley Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. WPD et al
as 1:2010cv00240
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Davis
Defendant:
WPD, Michael Rinehart, WPD Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
