Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Wright v. The Huntington National Bank et al
as 1:2024cv07507
Plaintiff:
Aretha Wright
Defendant:
The Huntington National Bank and Stephen D. Steinour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Stewart et al v. Derbort et al
as 2:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Julie Hawkins, Jarryd Hawkins, Vicki Stewart and others
Defendant:
Massey, Shane G. Brandel, E.L. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Village of Posen et al.
as 1:2024cv06441
Defendant:
Frank Podbielniak and Village of Posen
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wright doing business as Eight 23 Barbershop of 14733 Kedzie Ave., Posen, Il
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wright v. Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02466
Plaintiff:
David Wright
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Kenneth Boudreau, James Cassidy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wright v. Calumet City et al
as 1:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Wright
Defendant:
Calumet City, Thaddeus Jones, Calumet City Inspectional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bey v. Clark, II et al
as 1:2023cv16854
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bey
Defendant:
Donald Clark, II, Patricia Sheridan, Marchand Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin et al
as 1:2023cv16177
Plaintiff:
Elijah Martin, Isiaih Martin and GABRIEL MANGOLA
Defendant:
Officer Edwards and Officer Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
