Cases 1 - 10 of 261
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bennett v. Robinhood Financial LLC
as 1:2024cv03829
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Bennett
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Roberts v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roberts
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. State Farm Insurance Companies et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Bennett
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Companies, Gayle Hardison and Luke Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Douglas v. Sauk Village, Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv14559
Plaintiff:
Sonya Douglas
Defendant:
Sauk Village, Illinois, Arnold Coleman, Aretha Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Perry v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv14364
Plaintiff:
Joseph Perry
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Nevill et al v. Cox et al
as 3:2023cv03273
Plaintiff:
Douglas Nevill, Becky Nevill, Jordin Nevill and others
Defendant:
Dan W Cox, Suzanne Keller and Rochester CUSD 3A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Douglas v. Woodford County et al
as 1:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Douglas
Defendant:
Woodford County, Woodford County Board and Charles Feeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
