Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SIMS v. UNITED STATES SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS DAVIN SIMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPERIOR COURT and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
L'ASSOCIATION DES AMERICAINS ACCIDENTELS, et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al
as 1:2020cv03573
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE MOSES, ALI KHANCHOUL, JULIE HOCQUET and others
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and CARL C. RISCH
Petitioner:
Noam Schreiber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIMS v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
as 1:2020cv02449
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. SIMS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01243
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGH v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00805
Defendant:
DEITRICH SIMS, WILLIAM P. BARR and EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Plaintiff:
HARPREET SINGH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02519
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BREWER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00565
Plaintiff:
JAMES BREWER , MARQUETTE FRAZIER and ARIK SIMS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , WILLIAM SMITH, JONATHAN ARMSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
BEY v. RAGGIO et al
as 1:2012cv01545
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SR CREAR BEY
Defendant:
LORRAINE A. RAGGIO , M. KENT SIMS , FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
